|
|
Part 1: Background: Natural and Coalition Models
Only in the 20th century has it become possible to make reasonable estimates of the entire human population of the world, current or past. The following table lists some of those estimates, based in part on data considered "most reliable" in a 1970 paper and in part on both overlapping and more recent data from the U. S. Census Bureau. Of course, the earliest entries are at best educated guesses. The later entries are more likely to be correct -- at least to have the right order of magnitude -- but you should be aware that there is no "world census" like the decennial U. S. census, in which an attempt is made to count every individual in this country.
Year (CE) |
Population (millions) |
Year (CE) |
Population (millions) |
|
1000 | 200 | 1940 | 2295 | |
1650 | 545 | 1950 | 2517 | |
1750 | 728 | 1955 | 2780 | |
1800 | 906 | 1960 | 3005 | |
1850 | 1171 | 1965 | 3345 | |
1900 | 1608 | 1970 | 3707 | |
1910 | 1750 | 1975 | 4086 | |
1920 | 1834 | 1980 | 4454 | |
1930 | 2070 | 1985 | 4850 |
The natural growth model for biological populations suggests that the growth rate is proportional to the population, that is,
dP/dt = k P,
where k is the productivity rate, the (constant) ratio of growth rate to population. We know that the solutions of this differential equation are exponential functions of the form
P = P0 ekt,
where P0 is the population at whatever time is considered to be t = 0.
In 1960 Heinz von Foerster, Patricia Mora, and Larry Amiot published a now-famous paper in Science (vol. 132, pp. 1291-1295). The authors argued that the growth pattern in the historic data can be explained by improvements in technology and communication that have molded the human population into an effective coalition in a vast game against Nature -- reducing the effect of environmental hazards, improving living conditions, and extending the average life span. They proposed a coalition growth model for which the productivity rate is not constant, but rather is an increasing function of P, namely, a function of the form kPr, where the power r is positive and presumably small. (If r were 0, this would reduce to the natural model -- which we know does not fit.) Since the productivity rate is the ratio of dP/dt to P, the model differential equation is
dP/dt = k Pr+1.
In Part 2 we consider the question of whether such a model can fit the historic data.
|
|
modules at math.duke.edu | Copyright CCP and the author(s), 1998-9 |